College / School:
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Department:
Department of Social Work
Program / Major
/ Certificate:
Master of Social Work
Assessment Coordinator(s)
Felicia Tuggle
Has there been a change to the Assessment Coordinator(s) since the last
assessment plan?
No
Person(s) responsible for writing and/or submitting this report:
Felicia Tuggle
The mission of the Department of Social Work prepares students to excel in
social work practice. The BSW programs prepares students for generalist practice
and the MSW program builds on the generalist foundation and prepares students
for advanced practice in Clinical and Social Administration. The Department
promotes student focused learning, affirms the African American legacy and
fosters a unique multicultural environment through its BSW and MSW curriculum
and advocacy roles in community change. The department graduates students who
are culturally competent to practice social work in rural, urban and global
settings.
Has this mission statement been revised since the last plan?
No
1. Students will be able to demonstrate ethical and professional behavior.
2. Students will be able to engage diversity and difference in practice.
3. Students will be able to advance human rights and social, economic, and environmental justice.
4. Students will be able to engage in practice-informed research and research-informed practice.
5. Students will be able to engage in policy practice.
6. The students will be able to engage with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
7. The students will be able to assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
8. The students will be able to intervene with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
9. The students will be able to evaluate practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
LINK TO: Assessment Report, 2014-2015 – Supporting
Documents
PSLO |
Semester |
Professor |
Courses |
Assessment Artifacts and Instruments |
Target Levels |
Results and Analysis of Results |
Actions in Response to Results |
|
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
1. Students will be able to demonstrate ethical and professional behavior. |
Fall 2014 |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6780 |
Administrator Interview Assignment scored with the Administrator Interview rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 1 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
OVERALL:
TARGET PARTIALLY MET |
Spring 2015 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6751 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation II assessed with Major Clinical Project rubric |
80 % of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 2 NOT MET On average, 72% of students performed at the satisfactory level |
|||
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6781 |
Leadership Framework Product scored with the Leadership Framework Product rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 3 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Shinaz Jindani |
MSWK 6791 |
Reflective Practice Poster Presentation assessed with 8 element rubric across all competencies |
80% of students will perform at the Proficient or Advanced level on all rubric elements |
TARGET 4 MET 97% of all students scored at the proficient or advanced level on all rubric elements |
||||
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
2. Students will be able to engage diversity and difference in practice. |
Fall 2014 |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6780 |
Administrator Interview Assignment scored with the Administrator Interview rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 1 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
OVERALL:
TARGET MET |
Spring 2015 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6751 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation II assessed with Major Clinical Project rubric |
80 % of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 2 MET On average, 82% of students performed at the satisfactory level |
|||
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6781 |
Leadership Framework Product scored with the Leadership Framework Product rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 3 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Shinaz Jindani |
MSWK 6791 |
Reflective Practice Poster Presentation assessed with 8 element rubric across all competencies |
80% of students will perform at the Proficient or Advanced level on all rubric elements |
TARGET 4 MET 97% of all students scored at the proficient or advanced level on all rubric elements |
||||
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
3. Students will be able to advance human rights and social, economic, and environmental justice. |
Fall 2014 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6750 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation I assessed with Major Clinical Project rubric |
80% of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 1 NOT MET On average, 75% of students performed at the satisfactory level |
OVERALL:
TARGET PARTIALLY MET |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6780 |
Administrator Interview Assignment scored with the Administrator Interview rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 2 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Spring 2014 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6751 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation II assessed with Major Clinical Project rubric |
80% of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 3 MET On average, 85% of students performed at the satisfactory level |
|||
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6781 |
Leadership Framework Product scored with the Leadership Framework Product rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 4 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Shinaz Jindani |
MSWK 6791 |
Reflective Practice Poster Presentation assessed with 8 element rubric across all competencies |
80% of students will perform at the Proficient or Advanced level on all rubric elements |
TARGET 5 MET 97% of all students scored at the proficient or advanced level on all rubric elements |
||||
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
4. Students will be able to engage in practice-informed research and research-informed practice. |
Fall 2014 |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6780 |
Administrator Interview Assignment scored with the Administrator Interview rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 1 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
OVERALL:
TARGET MET |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6751 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation I assessed with Major Clinical Project rubric |
80 % of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 2 MET 100 % of students performed at the satisfactory level |
||||
Spring 2015 |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6781 |
Leadership Framework Product scored with the Leadership Framework Product rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 3 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
|||
Shinaz Jindani |
MSWK 6791 |
Reflective Practice Poster Presentation assessed with 8 element rubric across all competencies |
80% of students will perform at the Proficient or Advanced level on all rubric elements |
TARGET 4 MET 97% of all students scored at the proficient or advanced level on all rubric elements |
||||
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
5. Students will be able to engage in policy practice. |
Fall 2014 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6650 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation I assessed with Major Clinical Project rubric |
80% of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 1 MET On average, 88% of students performed at the satisfactory level |
OVERALL:
TARGET MET |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6780 |
Administrator Interview Assignment scored with the Administrator Interview rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 2 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Spring 2015 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6651 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation II assessed with Major Clinical Project II rubric |
80% of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 3 MET On average, 94% of students performed at the satisfactory level |
|||
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6781 |
Leadership Framework Product scored with the Leadership Framework Product rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 4 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Shinaz Jindani |
MSWK 6791 |
Reflective Practice Poster Presentation assessed with 8 element rubric across all competencies |
80% of students will perform at the Proficient or Advanced level on all rubric elements |
TARGET 5 MET 97% of all students scored at the proficient or advanced level on all rubric elements |
||||
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
6. The students will be able to engage with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. |
Fall 2014 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6650 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation I assessed with Major Clinical Project I rubric |
80 % of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 1 NOT MET On average, 65% of students performed at the satisfactory level |
OVERALL: TARGET PARTIALLY MET |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6780 |
Administrator Interview Assignment scored with the Administrator Interview rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 2 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Spring 2015 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6651 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation II assessed with Major Clinical Project II rubric |
80 % of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 3 NOT MET On average, 76 % of students performed at the satisfactory level |
|||
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6781 |
Leadership Framework Product scored with the Leadership Framework Product rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 4 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Shinaz Jindani |
MSWK 6791 |
Reflective Practice Poster Presentation assessed with 8 element rubric across all competencies |
80% of students will perform at the Proficient or Advanced level on all rubric elements |
TARGET 5 MET 97% of all students scored at the proficient or advanced level on all rubric elements |
||||
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
7. The students will be able to assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. |
Fall 2014 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6650 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation I assessed with Major Clinical Project and Presentation I rubric |
80 % of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 1 MET 100 % of students performed at the satisfactory level |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6780 |
Administrator Interview Assignment scored with the Administrator Interview rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 2 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Spring 2015 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6651 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation II assessed with Major Clinical Project II rubric |
80 % of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 3 MET 100 % of students performed at the satisfactory level |
|||
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6781 |
Leadership Framework Product scored with the Leadership Framework Product rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 4 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Shinaz Jindani |
MSWK 6791 |
Reflective Practice Poster Presentation assessed with 8 element rubric across all competencies |
80% of students will perform at the Proficient or Advanced level on all rubric elements |
TARGET 5 MET 97% of all students scored at the proficient or advanced level on all rubric elements |
||||
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
8. The students will be able to intervene with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. |
Fall 2014 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6650 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation I assessed with Major Clinical Project and Presentation I rubric |
80% of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 1 MET 100 % of students performed at the satisfactory level |
OVERALL:
TARGET MET |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6780 |
Administrator Interview Assignment scored with the Administrator Interview rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 2 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Spring 2015 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6651 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation II assessed with Major Clinical Project II rubric |
80% of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 3 MET 100% of students performed at the satisfactory level |
|||
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6781 |
Leadership Framework Product scored with the Leadership Framework Product rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 4 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Shinaz Jindani |
MSWK 6791 |
Reflective Practice Poster Presentation assessed with 8 element rubric across all competencies |
80% of students will perform at the Proficient or Advanced level on all rubric elements |
TARGET 5 MET 97% of all students scored at the proficient or advanced level on all rubric elements |
||||
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
9. The students will be able to evaluate practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. |
Fall 2014 |
Adrian Anderson |
MSWK 6650 |
Major Clinical Project and Presentation I assessed with Major Clinical Project and Presentation I rubric |
80 % of students will perform at the satisfactory level |
TARGET 1 MET On average, 93% of students performed at the satisfactory level |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6780 |
Administrator Interview Assignment scored with the Administrator Interview rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 2 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
||||
Spring 2015 |
Randy Gunter |
MSWK 6781 |
Leadership Framework Product scored with the Leadership Framework Product rubric |
80% of students will perform at the proficient level or above |
TARGET 3 MET 100% of students performed at the proficient level or above |
|||
Shinaz Jindani |
MSWK 6791 |
Reflective Practice Poster Presentation assessed with 8 element rubric across all competencies |
80% of students will perform at the Proficient or Advanced level on all rubric elements |
TARGET 4 MET 97% of all students scored at the proficient or advanced level on all rubric elements |
SSU Strategic Plan Goal |
PO Goal |
Enabling Strategies |
Measures |
Targets |
Results and Analysis of Results |
Actions in Response to Results |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
Enhance program structure and curriculum in preparation for CSWE reaffirmation |
a. MSW faculty will meet on a monthly basis to review the final approved CSWE 2015 EPAS and incorporate into curriculum and assessment. b. Faculty will make revisions to the curriculum map and benchmark assignments as necessary to ensure compliance. c. Faculty will attend CSWE Reaffirmation session(s) at CSWE Annual Program meeting to gain additional clarity. d. Faculty will collectively review the CSWE published 2008 to 2015 EPAS Crosswalk document |
i. Updated program curriculum maps for generalist, clinical, and social administration concentrations. ii. Handouts distributed from CSWE Reaffirmation workshop at annual meeting.
|
i. 4/6 of current faculty will attend CSW Annual Program meeting. ii.100% of assessment plans will be reviewed to ensure that each competency measures a minimum of two of the required domains. |
TARGET MET Four faculty (Jindani, Deloach, Samuel, and Tuggle) attended the CSWE Annual Program meeting in Tampa, FL. Faculty participated in reaffirmation sessions and shared the information provided (i.e. 2008-2015 crosswalk document) with other faculty upon return. Faculty identified the need to revise benchmark assignments to ensure that each PSLO/Competency measured two domains at each level of the program. |
OVERALL:
TARGET MET Description of any changes for improvements which were made during the course of the 2014-2015 academic year: Faculty was unsuccessful in going through the benchmark assignments and ensuring that each assignment measured two of the CSWE required domains due to inconsistent attendance from all faculty members at MSW Program and Assessment meetings. Description of the expected use of results that will be addressed in the 2015-2016 academic year: The Dept. Chair and CLASS Dean will notify faculty that attendance and participation in assessment meetings is required. |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
Increase the use of technology to enhance and assess instructional delivery in the classroom and field practicum |
a. Faculty will be encouraged to redesign elective courses to make them fully online. b. Field faculty and staff will begin piloting performance evaluations and tools that will be completed in Live Text. Director of Field Education will work with Department Chair and CLASS Dean to identify funding sources. c. Director of Field will also work with Live Text implementation team to prepare for a Fall 2015 launch. |
i. # of courses that are offered fully online from 2013-2014 AY as evidenced by course offerings ii. Quote from Live text for FEM accounts iii. Communication (e-mails and meeting appointments) with Live Text Implementation Team |
i. A minimum of 1 course in the generalist and advanced practice level will be offered fully online. ii. Quote for FEM accounts will be received by end of Spring 2016 semester. iii. # of in-person and online meetings with Live Text Implementation team to develop FEM for Fall 2015 launch |
TARGET MET A total of 3 courses were revised and taught fully online (Crisis Intervention, Gerontology, and Drug and Alcohol Abuse). In addition to the fully online courses, field Obtained quote from Live Text for $2,000. Dean�s office has agreed to pay for student add-on accounts A total of 4 online meetings were held with Live Text Implementation Coordinator Carrie Diaz over the Summer 2015 semester. |
OVERALL: TARGET MET Description of projected use of results from the 2013-2014 academic year that is being addressed in the 2014-2015 academic year: Faculty discussed the need to ensure instructor expectations were clearly communicated the first week of classes. Faculty discussed and agreed on organizing courses by topical modules.
Description of any changes for improvements which were made during the course of the 2014-2015 academic year: Faculty also outlined common course expectations for students taking fully online classes.
Description of the expected use of results that will be addressed in the 2015-2016 academic year: Live Text FEM add-on accounts purchased during Summer 2015. Student registration codes will be distributed during Fall 2015. |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
Increase local and global outreach and visibility by fostering lifelong learning and engagement with students, faculty, staff, alumni and the SSU community
|
a. The Office of Field Education will engaged in targeted outreach to recruit additional field placement agencies for students to complete practicum placements. Faculty will apply for grant funding that is responsiveness to campus and community needs. Faculty advisers will encourage social work student organizations to design and implement community service project. b. Field Faculty will work with community agencies to create opportunities for students to engage in project-based learning that is responsive to identified community and organizational needs. c. Faculty will actively recruit students to travel abroad for short and long term trips |
i. # of new field placements established; ii. # of new grants awarded iii. # of trainings provided to the community iv. # of community service and project-based learning opportunities students participate in v.# of social work students who travel abroad Sign in sheets and training evaluations will be used for continuous quality improvement. |
i. 4 new field placements will be established. ii. A minimum of 2 training/workshop will be offered to students, alumni, and professionals in the community. iii.Students in field practicum will assess agency needs and identify present the agency with one practical gift that addresses identified needs (update a brochure, develop a manual, etc.) iv. At least 4 students will travel abroad |
TARGET MET A total of 5 new field agencies were added this academic year. These agencies entered in MOUs with SSU Drs. Deloach, Berry, and Samuel received a SAMHSA funded behavioral health grant to increase the number of professionally trained social workers in the area of behavioral health working with children, adolescents, and transitioning age youth. Students participated in three Department sponsored service learning opportunities (VA Stand Down and Make a Difference Day, and World Food Day). Spring 2015, a total of 2 graduate students (2 undergraduate) participated in a 10 day alternative Spring Break in Trinidad and Tobago. 2 Faculty oversaw the trip and conducted a 2-day Grief and Loss Conference. |
OVERALL: TARGET MET Description of projected use of results from the 2013-2014 academic year that is being addressed in the 2014-2015 academic year: Additional clinical based field agencies are needed to meet the demand of advanced practice students seeking clinical placements. Additionally training is needed to ensure that existing and new field agencies are oriented to CSWE 2015 EPAS requirements. Description of any changes for improvements which were made during the course of the 2014-2015 academic year: The Behavior Health Grant made it possible for 13 students to receive advanced training in behavior health. A licensure preparation workshop was offered to students, alumni, and SSU Community. Forty participants attended this event. Description of the expected use of results that will be addressed in the 2015-2016 academic year: Funding to finance study abroad trips continues to be the greatest challenge for graduate students. Many students express interest and desire but lack funding. The program will work with the Office of International Education to identify additional resources for graduate students to travel aboard. |